Your agent shipped. Can you prove the work cleared a bar?
This page is a receipt: a real quality bar, a real miss, the judge’s criticism, and the iteration that cleared it.
Ops Operator Brief Validation — PR description unblock (v2)
- The bar
Accept only at 0.75 or above — compiled into a weighted rubric:
Score 0-1 on: current state (0.20), risk/decision clarity (0.20), budget or reliability impact (0.25), owner (0.15), next action (0.20).
- The miss · Aug 12, 06:22 UTC
Scored 0.82 — below the bar. The judge said why:
“- It does not actually specify the downstream contract details it says must be extracted (expected artifact_type and required fields).”
- Cleared · Aug 12, 06:23 UTC
0.80 — passed the bar and moved on. No human had to babysit the retry.
Full eval record — every attempt, every run id
Rubric
Score 0-1 on: current state (0.20), risk/decision clarity (0.20), budget or reliability impact (0.25), owner (0.15), next action (0.20).
“- Current state (0.20): 0.17 — Clear purpose and acknowledges missing specifics (expected downstream contract details, artifact ID, error l…”
run 8ee1d0c0-e8a7-4dc1-ab99-9fd685a6ecfb“The artifact is well-structured and directly addresses the stated dependency (“Write and save PR description artifact”) by adding concrete…”
run 041a5a73-de5c-4888-9dea-d606fd783921“- It does not actually specify the downstream contract details it says must be extracted (expected artifact_type and required fields).”
run b5bef7ed-2990-4631-b3e6-1ab74223fc11“- Current state (0.20): 0.16 — Clearly states the initiative and that required missing context is not provided (artifact ID / expected down…”
run bb003035-2029-4b02-943e-ed79675e0a3f“Gaps/risks: (1) While it instructs to extract expected `artifact_type` and `required_fields_list`, the artifact itself does not include any…”
run bcd63a08-ebd3-463e-b4d2-ac965bea4435“- Current state (0.20): 0.16 — Clearly states what is known (missing expected artifact ID/contract/schema and provider error lines) and wha…”
run 97242285-5c26-4860-a30c-f7dec5adb89fEvery number below comes from the eval record that produced it.
eng · documenteng pull request artifact0.181.9s judge · 2 evals
“However, it does not actually deliver the required `eng.pull_request` (or `eng.structured_blocker`) with the concrete “next command/action,…”
run 3117e7fb-e2cf-4810-8354-ac9f7eb1c10c“However, it does **not** deliver the requested core outcome of an actual **eng.pull_request** (or a concrete **eng.structured_blocker** wit…”
run 99dc0957-c9d4-4eb5-a772-d9256d9f58c1marketing · launch assetMarketing Launch Asset (Day 1) — Hope Draft: Pain Tweet + Reply Seeding (Drafted Only)0.652.5s judge · 5 evals
Rubric
Score 0-1 on: audience specificity (0.20), channel fit (0.20), asset usefulness (0.25), hypothesis and metric (0.20), review/publish status (0.15).
“- The pain topic is clear (verification/receipts for autonomous work), but there’s no tight target persona (e.g., role/industry) and it sta…”
run 21b8710c-add2-4c8d-b20c-af005d6b5023“Gaps / risks: The artifact references WS1/WS3 in the decision request but does not include those constraints or map them to the checklist,…”
run 3dd40b39-a3ad-41e5-b999-9e662dbcaaf9“Minor gaps/risks that slightly lower the score: (1) The draft includes a branded/internal reference (“Revenue Spine” / “notary loop”) which…”
run 607aa8b3-adc1-42d3-b05e-1e5f56dec387“Gaps/risks preventing a perfect score: (1) The artifact references WS1/WS3 in the decision request but does not explicitly show those const…”
run b958e61b-f588-4a13-a46a-9609b40f889d“Overall: The artifact is a solid Day-1 X organic draft with built-in approval/attribution safety, but it’s somewhat generic and lacks expli…”
run 433b55ac-af12-405a-a388-927948bbfc26ops · operator briefOps Operator Brief (Validation): Unblock 'Write & save PR description artifact'0.862.0s judge · 5 evals
Rubric
Score 0-1 on: current state (0.20), risk/decision clarity (0.20), budget or reliability impact (0.25), owner (0.15), next action (0.20).
“Minor deductions are for a couple of checklist/precision gaps rather than missing fundamentals.”
run c6f86b4a-d150-4840-ab20-9992a27b275e“It clearly defines a guardrail (pre-flight quota/billing check before any LLM call), explicitly prevents cross-provider fallback loops, and…”
run 6230f9ee-9d1a-49a0-9547-09e15f29e7a0“The artifact is strong and largely satisfies the purpose of an ops operator brief: it clearly states the goal (unblock writing/saving the P…”
run 6d8042d0-2a75-430f-87cb-65d4722ae836“- Defines fail-fast behavior: provides a structured blocker template for the “both providers exhausted” case.”
run 75d89da5-91db-4ad3-83de-6bc66426c3ca“- Budget or reliability impact (0.25/0.25): Directly links fail-fast to reduced wasted credits/latency and clearer failure causes.”
run df1076c9-510e-43c7-b04f-b3f299ac5a89design · documentpurpose-first artifact template — Feedback pack (Revenue Spine) v2 (a11y + evidence minimums)0.883.8s judge · 4 evals
Rubric
Score 0-1 on: surface specificity (0.20), finding/spec quality (0.25), accessibility notes (0.20), implementation guidance (0.20), validation notes (0.15).
“- Validation notes (0.15): Solid but slightly less measurable than the others.”
run 259a2b56-b3f2-48f4-93f5-4957b9b678b4“- The artifact specifies “one H1, then H2 for the three purpose-first sections,” but the template itself uses only H2/H3 headings in Markdo…”
run 342aa4d1-86a1-49b3-9486-c59779145763“Minor issues preventing a perfect score: (1) the “one H1, then H2” requirement conflicts slightly with the markdown which uses multiple H2/…”
run 36fd082d-1c8a-4e6d-90d1-036d7473159a“- The document says “one H1, then H2 for the three purpose-first sections,” but the template itself is in markdown with multiple headings;…”
run dd1562c6-1226-4433-83b1-f13dfc70f7fesales · deal reviewfailed → cleared10-Account Convergence Slate Draft (with evidence + routing) — NO SENDS [Eval-Safe]0.862.1s judge · 4 evals
Rubric
Score 0-1 on: ICP clarity (0.18), target segment (0.16), offer (0.18), sequence (0.18), objections (0.15), next-send plan (0.15).
“Overall: Good internal-only slate with evidence, deduping, and routing; however, several rubric gaps reduce effectiveness—especially around…”
run 8debd3d3-16d0-465b-bd10-1d5755de1622“Main gaps: (1) reviewer separation is described in the header but not concretely instantiated with named reviewers/ownership fields per acc…”
run 320c1b2f-0ae7-4179-a215-ce97a9af0c4e“Also includes a Shaurya receipt block indicating missing receipt is not to be invented, which is a good compliance safeguard.”
run 354f7515-d769-42fb-ade6-744cfe26a312“Gaps/risks reducing the score: the artifact references “account_id matches the queue CSV” but no explicit account_id/IDs are provided (only…”
run 368eaa5e-caba-452f-b664-81270c9fdde2product · structured blockerCustomer Discovery Validation — Blocked (Missing initiative/workstream + target customer/problem inputs)0.952.3s judge · 5 evals
Rubric
Score 0-1 on: exact blocker (0.30), evidence or missing input (0.25), owner/escalation clarity (0.20), next action (0.25).
“- The title and exact_reason clearly state why the customer discovery validation cannot be completed honestly, specifically citing the miss…”
run 2322372b-00c4-426d-afe0-0c8b202cec07“It clearly states why the work cannot be completed honestly, provides an explicit list of missing inputs, includes what was attempted, and…”
run 459e0f5e-af4d-46e0-b2b3-68e53ad26176“The artifact is a high-quality structured blocker: it clearly states the objective, marks status as blocked, provides specific, actionable…”
run 89ee8a98-0e23-4d57-9f37-287123ed062c“It includes (a) a specific title, (b) concrete reasons tied to missing inputs (canonical workstream hierarchy + target customer/problem def…”
run ddcbc6d7-e39b-4550-b13d-b8608bfabe3d“- Clearly states why customer discovery validation cannot be completed honestly (missing canonical workstream hierarchy + missing target cu…”
run c6037b39-46df-4bcf-abaa-9b09a0f6a608Prefer the unedited version? Open a live room, warts and all.